Incisional Hernia with Loss of Domain as a Consequence of Botulinum Toxin a and the Covid-19 Pandemic

Introduction: Abdominal wall surgery has been one of the major victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a large number of patients who have seen their surgery delayed and many are still waiting to be operated on today. On the other hand, botulinum toxin is one of the main protagonists in optimizing abdominal wall surgery, especially important in complex hernia, but we must not forget that it can have adverse effects. Case report: We present the case of a 54-year-old man with a history of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, chronic renal failure and kidney transplant in 2000, who presented a midline incisional hernia as a result of an epigastric hernia operated on in 2006 and subsequently two onlay permanent synthetic mesh in 2010 and 2015. In February 2020 he presented an incisional hernia M2-4W3R3 with a volume of 35%, botox was infiltrated as optimization for surgery and while awaiting placement of a pneumoperitoneum catheter, the surgery was suspended due to the COVID-19 situation. He returns to our clinics in 2022 with a growth of the hernia and a volume of 95%. Weight loss, botulinum toxin and preoperative pneumoperitoneum were indicated. We performed a reconstruction of the abdominal wall with bilateral transversus abdominal release and preperitoneal 45x60cm polyvinylidene fluoride mesh and abdominoplasty. Discussion(s): Botulinum toxin can facilitate abdominal surgery, especially in complex hernias, but we must not forget that blocking the abdominal muscles can have adverse effects. The COVID-19 pandemic has been especially hard on surgical waiting lists, delaying surgeries and aggravating pathologies.

Surgical treatment of acute intestinal obstruction in the infectious department environment for covid-19 patients.

Surgical care in a mono-hospital for patients with COVID-19 leads to a number of organisational problems due to the lack of specialised departments. The article presents the experience of surgical treatment in a mono-hospital obtained from one and a half years of work in this mode. In total, approximately 400 surgeries were performed. The experience of treatment of 7 patients with acute intestinal obstruction has been summarised. In the abdominal cavity, a significant number of hematomas of varied localisation were found under the parietal and visceral peritoneum, as well as in the subcutaneous fat. This is possibly associated with anticoagulant therapy included in the treatment regimen for patients with COVID-19 according to the methodical recommendations by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. As an illustration, a successful case of treating COVID-19 patient with strangulated hernia of the abdominal white line complicated by acute intestinal obstruction is presented.Copyright © 2022, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University. All rights reserved.

ID: 219407 The Cardiac Patient and Neuromodulation, When Anticoagulation Dictates the Intervention

Introduction: Patients with cardiac comorbidities present unique challenges for undergoing interventional pain procedures. Consensus guidelines on safe anticoagulation management are categorized by procedure, patient specific bleeding risk factors, and class of anticoagulation (Table 1, Table 2).1 Specifically, some procedures occur in close proximity to the spinal cord, require large gauge needles and styletted leads, while others are in compressible locations with minimal tissue disruption. Further, pain-induced hypercoagulation increases the risk of thrombo-vascular events.1 This accentuates the importance of interdisciplinary perioperative coordination with the prescribing cardiologist. Case: A 71-year-old male with past-medical-history of CABG, bilateral femoral-popliteal bypass, atrial fibrillation on apixaban and ticagrelor, and multiple cardiac stents presented with intermittent shooting axial back pain radiating to right buttock, lateral thigh, and calf, worsened with activity. MRI demonstrated thoracic myelomalacia, multi-level lumbar disc herniation, and moderate central canal stenosis. An initial multi-model treatment approach utilizing pharmacologic agents, physical therapy, ESI's, and RFA failed to alleviate symptoms. After extensive discussion with his cardiologist, he was scheduled for a three-day SCS trial. Ticagrelor and apixaban were held throughout the 3-day trial and for 5 and 3 days prior, respectively, while ASA was maintained. Successful trial with tip placement at T6 significantly improved function and pain scores (Figure 1). Upon planned percutaneous implant, the cardiologist recommended against surgical implantation and holding anticoagulation. Alternatively, the patient underwent bilateral lumbar medial branch PNS implant with sustained improvement in lower back symptoms. However, he contracted COVID, resulting in delayed lead explanation (>60 days) without complication. Conclusion(s): Interventional pain practice advisories are well established for anticoagulation use in the perioperative period.1,2 However, there is limited high-quality research on the appropriate length to hold anticoagulation prior to surgery for high thrombotic risk patients. Collegial decision making with the cardiologist was required to avoid deleterious procedural complications. However, they may be unfamiliar with the nuances between interventions or between trial and implant. Prospective studies have shown that low risk procedures, such as the PNS, may not require holding anticoagulants.3 Other case data has demonstrated post-SCS epidural hematoma with ASA use after being held for 1-week prior to surgery. Our patient was unable to undergo SCS implant and instead elected for a lower risk procedure with excellent efficacy. 4 However, delayed PNS lead extraction due to COVID19 hospitalization presented further risk of infection and lead fracture.5 PNS may prove to be an appropriate treatment option for patients who are anticoagulated and are not SCS candidates. Disclosure: Elliot Klein, MD,MPH: None, Clarence Kong, MD: None, Shawn Sidharthan, MD: None, Peter Lascarides, DO: None, Yili Huang, DO: NoneCopyright © 2023

Evaluating Efficacy Of Functional Luminal Imaging Probe In Preoperative Evaluation For Antireflux Procedures

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant decreases in outpatient procedures, many of which are required before to antireflux operation (ARS). The purpose of this study was to add functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and esophageal pH monitoring to assess its utility in decreasing the need for follow up studies in patients being evaluated for ARS. Method(s): Retrospective observational study was performed on 81 patients being evaluated for GERD who underwent EGD, pH monitoring, and FLIP. Data collected included average distensibility index (DI) at 60 mL, presence of repetitive anterograde or retrograde contractions, hiatal hernia dimensions, pathology results, pH data, and need for follow-up testing. Result(s): Based on FLIP results, HRM was recommended in 35 patients (43.2%). This included 14 patients with DI suggestive of significant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, eight of whom completed HRM with four confirmed as achalasia. FLIP results were suspicious for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in four patients of which one was confirmed as EoE on biopsy. Gastric emptying study was felt to be necessary for 11 patients before to ARS. Conclusion(s): FLIP identified patients with possible alternative pathologies including achalasia and EoE that would otherwise be a contraindication to ARS. FLIP at the time of EGD and pH monitoring is useful as it guides the clinical decision on need for additional outpatient procedures, which may be difficult to obtain in pandemic conditions. FLIP was effective at reducing the requirements for further follow-up testing in the majority of patients being evaluated for potential ARS.

Outpatient treatment of abdominal wall hernia. A strategy to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Outpatient treatment of the abdominal wall hernia. A strategy to reduce the impact of the Covid-19 AIM: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of the treatment of abdominal wall hernias in ambulatory setting in selected patients to break down long waiting lists due to the COVID 19 pandemic.METHODS: From February to June 2021, we performed 120 hernia repair operations with local anesthesia in ambulatory settings without anesthetists. (105 inguinal hernia, 6 femoral hernia and 9 umbilical hernia). All patients were selected from our waiting lists first through a telephone interview through an adequate collection of the anamnesis and then clinically (LEE index and ASA score) and based on the characteristics of the hernia.RESULTS: For all patients, the operation was performed under local anesthesia with lidocaine and naropine. Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair were performed for all patients with inguinal hernia;polypropylene mesh-plug was the technique used to repair the crural hernias while a direct plastic was performed for the treatment of umbilical hernias.. The mean age was 58 years. We did not observe any intraoperative complications and patients were discharged after 4 hours of operation. There was no case of readmission. Only 3 (2.5%) patients developed scrotal bruising. We did not observe any other complications or recurrence at 30 days and 6 months. Most patients (97.5%) expressed satisfaction for local anesthesia and for the path created.CONCLUSION: Hernia pathologies could be treated in ambulatory setting with good results in selected patients and could represent an alternative to face the limitations imposed by the COVID pandemic on daily surgical activities.

Reactivation of Surgical Campaigns after the Covid Pandemic: Surgeons in Action with Hernia International Foundations in 2022

Aim: The Cirujanos en Accion and Hernia International foundations carried out their own and collaborative surgical campaigns in developing countries. In 2020 and 2021 the programme had to be suspended due to Covid. In 2022 we restarted our actions, analysed the difficulties of reactivation and described the campaigns that had been carried out and those that had to be delayed. Material/ Methods: We describe the 9 campaigns of Surgeons in Action, our own and in collaboration with Hernia International and our own campaign to the region of Naborno Karabakh, planned for September and cancelled 24 hours before departure due to the resurgence of armed conflict. An analysis is made of volunteers, places, type (adults or children or mixed), collaborations with other foundations, patients operated and procedures done according to pathologies, integration with local staff with exchange of knowledge. Result(s): Made in 8 countries (Benin, Camerun, Gambia (2), Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Tanzania, Sierra Leone) and postponed in one country, the Naborno Karabakh region of Armenia. 85 volunteers (25 general and 10 paediatric surgeons, 19 anaesthetists, 3 intensivists, 23 nurses, 5 audiovisuals);local staff;1144 patients (473 children, 671 adults), 1325 procedures for various pathologies (hernias, goitres, hydroceles, undescendend testis, soft tissue tumours, etc.) Conclusion(s): 9 campaigns have been carried out successfully and new locations have been opened with a good projection for the coming years, and we have experienced difficulties with the cancellation of a mega-campaign in an area with geopolitical conflicts - to be taken into account in the future.

Groin Hernia Repair during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Romanian Nationwide Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Groin hernia repair surgery (GHRS) is among the most common elective interventions. The aim of this three-year nationwide study on GHRS is to provide a thorough analysis of the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on the Romanian Health System in regard to elective procedures. Materials and Methods: 46,795 groin hernia cases obtained between 2019 and 2021 from the DRG database using ICD-10 diagnostic codes. The data were collected from all 261 GHRS performing hospitals nationwide, including 227 public hospitals (PbH) and 34 private hospitals (PvH). The 42 variables taken into account were processed using Microsoft Excel 2021, applying Chi square, F-Test Two-Sample for variances, and Two Sample t-Test. The significance threshold considered was p < 0.001. Results: Of the grand total of cases, 96.2% were inguinal hernias, 86.8% were performed on men, 15.2% were laparoscopic procedures, and 6.88% were in PvH. Overall, due to the pandemic, the total number of GHRS decreased with 44.45% in 2020 and with 29.72% in 2021 compared to pre-pandemic year 2019. April 2020 shows the steepest decrease in GHRS (91 procedures nationwide). In the private sector, there was an opposite trend with increases in the number of cases by 12.21% and a 70.22% in both pandemic years. The mean admission period (MAP) for all procedures was 5.5 days. There was a significant difference between PbH and PvH (5.75 vs. 2.8 days, p < 0.0001). During the pandemic, the MAP in PbH decreased (6.02 in 2019, 5.82 in 2020 and 5.3 in 2021), remaining stable for PvH (2.9 days in 2019, 2.85 days in 2020 and 2.74 days in 2021). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced the overall number of GHRS performed in Romania in 2020 and 2021, compared to 2019. However, the private sector thrived with an actual increase in the number of cases. There was a significant lower MAP in the PvH compared to PbH throughout the three-year period.

Strangulated obturator hernia in a COVID-19 patient: a rare case presentation and the role of computed tomography in diagnosis

Obturator hernia is a rare cause of acute abdomen resulting from a protrusion of intra-abdominal contents through the obturator foramen in the pelvis. Obturator hernia is often seen in older adults, emaciated individuals, and chronically ill women. The preoperative diagnosis of obturator hernia is frequently delayed because its nonspecific signs and symptoms complicate the diagnostic pro-cess, leading to high mortality rates. The most common clinical presentation of obturator hernia is intestinal obstruction with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Symptoms caused by the compression and irritation of the obturator nerve within the canal are less common. Open or laparoscopic surgery is the only available treatment;it allows abdominal cavity exploration and hernia reduction. The widespread and increasing use of computed tomography has played an important role in diagnosing conditions. Here, we present the case of a 90-year-old woman di-agnosed with strangulated obturator hernia and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who under-went emergency surgery at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. We emphasize the role of computed tomography in establishing a prompt preoperative diagnosis and planning an appropriate surgical intervention for this rare condition.

A Thorn in his Side

History: A 20 year old D1 men's basketball player with a history of COVID the month prior presented with worsening low back pain. He denied any injury, but reported the pain started as low back discomfort after a basketball game the week prior. He noted a progression and radiation of pain down his right lower extremity to his toes. He had tried physical therapy and dry needling, as well as cyclobenzaprine and naproxen from team physicians with mild improvement. The pain worsened and he went to the ED for evaluation. He was afebrile and had a lumbar radiograph with no acute fracture, grade 1 anterolisthesis of L5 on S1. He was discharged home with norco. Over the next 2 days, he developed chills and in the context of his worsening back pain, his team physicians ordered an MRI. Physical Exam: BMI 26.9 Temp 97.9degree Heart rate: 73 Respiratory rate 14 BP: 124/64 MSK: Spine- Intact skin with generalized pain over lumbar area, worse over the right paraspinal musculature. 5/5 strength of bilateral lower extremity flexion and extension of his hips, knees, and plantar and dorsiflexion of ankles and toes. Bilateral intact sensibility in the sciatic, femoral, superficial, and deep peroneal, sural, and saphenous nerve distributions. Slightly diminished sensibility over the right deep peroneal nerve distribution compared to left. 2/4 patellar and achilles DTRs. No clonus, downgoing Babinski sign. Positive straight leg raise at 45 degrees with the right lower extremity. Differential Diagnosis: 141. Sciatica 142. Lumbar Muscle Strain 143. Disk Herniation 144. Spondylolisthesis 145. Vertebral Osteomyelitis Test Results: CBC:WBC10, HGB13.2, neutrophils 75.7% (red 45%-74%). Unremarkable CMP. CRP =7.31, ESR 23 Blood culture negative, throat culture negative. TB test negative. COVID test negative. Flu test negative. Urine culture and UDS negative. HIV test negative. Procalcitonin of 0.07. IR guided aspiration and bacterial Culture yielded MSSA. MRI w/contrast: showing L1-L4 facet edema concerning for infectious spondylitis, intramuscular, and epidural abscess. Final Diagnosis: Acute intramuscular abscess, vertebral osteomyelitis, with epidural abscess. Discussion(s): Vertebral osteomyelitis is a serious but quite rare disease in the immunocompetent, elite athlete population. Staphylococcus Aureus is the culprit a majority of the time, with only 50% of cases showing neurologic symptoms. This case was unique given the proximity to a dry needling treatment which is the only explainable vector of infection, normal blood cultures in this disease which hematogenously spreads, negativeHIV and other infectious disease testing, and otherwise benign history. Early recognition of this disease yields better outcomes and reduces incidence of severe debility. 5% to 10%of patients experience recurrence of back pain or osteomyelitis later on in life. Outcome(s): Patient was hospitalized and started on Cefepime and Vancomycin. Had an echocardiogram revealing changes consistent with athlete's heart without signs of vegetation on his cardiac valves. Neurosurgery declined to treat surgically. He continued to improve until he was ultimately discharged on hospital day 4 with a picc line and Nafcillin and was later changed to oral augmentin per ID. Follow-Up: By his 6 week follow-up visit with infectious disease and the team physicians, his back pain had completely resolved and was cleared to start a return to play protocol. There was no progression of disease since starting antibiotics, and no recurrence of back pain since treatment.

Posterior Mediastinal Mass: Unraveling a Non-Traumatic Herniation of the Caudate Lobe of the Liver

Introduction: Posterior mediastinal mass is most likely due to neurogenic tumor, meningocele or thoracic spine lesions. Caudate lobe of the liver herniation presenting as posterior mediastinal mass is a rare occurrence. Diaphragmatic herniation (DH) of the caudate lobe presents in various way including dyspnea, dyspepsia or incidental finding on imaging. We present a case of diaphragmatic hernia of the caudate lobe of the liver presenting as a posterior mediastinal mass found during evaluation of dyspnea. Case Description/Methods: A 75-year-old female presented to her physician with worsening shortness of breath from her baseline of 3 days duration. She had a history of sarcoidosis, COVID pneumonia over 1 year ago, COPD, diastolic heart failure, and hypertension. She was initially evaluated for COVID re-infection, which was negative and a CT of the chest with contrast to check for sarcoidosis flare revealed posterior mediastinal mass measuring 4.5 x 6.5 x 6.4 cm. Further work up with CT chest and abdomen with contrast revealed that the posterior mediastinal mass had similar attenuation as the liver and appears continuous with the caudate lobe of the liver. This was confirmed by NM scan of liver. Review of her records from an outside organization revealed similar finding on imaging a few years ago. Patient denied any history of trauma and laboratory work up revealed normal liver functions. After pulmonologist evaluation she was started on 2 L home oxygen following six-minute walk test, and also CPAP following a positive sleep study. Pulmonary function tests were performed and inhalers were continued. Given the chronicity of her symptoms and co-morbidities with stable caudate lobe herniation, conservative management was advised with surgery warranted if symptoms persist despite treatment (Figure 1). Discussion(s): DH is typically found on the left side with stomach or intestine while the right side is usually guarded by the liver. Isolated herniation of part of the liver into the thoracic cavity is rarely reported and is mostly acute from traumatic or spontaneous rupture requiring immediate repair. Our patient was initially evaluated for the posterior mediastinal mass for concerns of tumor, followed by the finding of what was thought to be acute herniation of the caudate lobe of liver into the thoracic cavity. Review of records showed this to be a stable lesion, we suspect that the patient had congenital diaphragmatic defect. Chronic and stable liver herniation into thoracic cavity can be managed conservatively if uncomplicated.

Integrating Bioethics and Neonatal Palliative Care in a Pandemic: The Scope of Advocacy and Online Collaboration for Exceptional Life-Sustaining Medical and Surgical Interventions in a Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Purpose of Study: The regional NICU is an essential healthcare resource for families of newborns with serious life-threatening illnesses. Mechanical ventilation, cardiovascular therapies, therapeutic hypothermia, and neonatal surgeries are common life-sustaining interventions. Our NICU serves an underprivileged population in a resource poor environment and several ethical questions frequently emerge when facing extremes of innovative therapies. The pandemic and rapidly changing institutional protocols accentuated challenges faced by frontline NICU teams caring for newborns at risk for devastating illnesses and death. Concurrently, evolving paradigms in neonatal ethics required urgent and high quality palliative care in a background of racial and socioeconomic inequities, restrictive visitation policies, and limited healthcare resources. The purpose of this study was to ensure that neonates and their families receive ethically sound care, timely referrals for innovative therapies, and specialized palliative care in the strained and uncertain environment of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Used: The key steps consisted of structured and impromptu discussion forums for specialized palliative care and medical ethics, perinatal case conferences and pediatrics grand rounds on virtual platforms, educational webinars for interdisciplinary teams, and improved electronic communication. Online collaboration and innovative combinations of in-person and virtual meetings were utilized for urgently Incorporating clinical updates. Summary of Results: 1. A neonate with severe HIE and postnatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia required emergent ECMO center referral. NICU providers utilized a structured bioethics and palliative care framework for providing family support and discussing the prognostication challenges of acute illnesses. 2. Many important bioethical questions emerged while caring for infants with life-threatening chromosomal abnormalities. Ethical tension was addressed by teaching tools, quality of life and pediatrics ethics conversations, mitigation of moral distress, contemporary clinical and surgical experience, community engagement, and family perspectives. 3. Ethical conflicts are central in the decision to resuscitate neonates born between 22 and 23 weeks of gestation. To provide urgent prenatal consultations and attend high risk deliveries, we collaborated across geographically distant healthcare systems, unified management strategies and analyzed outcomes data. 4. NEC in several extremely preterm babies had devastating outcomes and the team respected each family's voice with compassionate, shared decision-making for both curative care surgeries and palliative care. Conclusion(s): The new workflows, telephone and video conferences, and redirection to telehealth based family meetings did not change important outcomes during the pandemic. Advocacy and education for integrating bioethics and palliative care were vital facets of neonatal critical care in a resource poor and ever-changing pandemic environment.

Main changes in the model of diagnosis-related groups in 2021.

The authors explain the main changes in the Russian model of diagnosis-related groups used for medical care payment from the funds of compulsory health insurance in 2021 compared to 2020. New diagnosis-related groups for payment for treatment of patients with malignancies of lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues, treatment and follow-up of patients with new coronavirus in-fection, rehabilitation after COVID-19 and cancer, surgical treatment of large and giant hernias with mesh implants are described. The authors discuss expanding the list of classification criteria for diagnosis-related groups, updating of approaches to cost weight coefficients for calculation of cost of antineoplastic treatment.Copyright © 2021, Media Sphera Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Spine Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Series

Background: Hospitals are one of the primary resources for disease transmission, so many guidelines were published, and neuro-surgeons were advised to postpone elective spine surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective(s): To avoid pulmonary complications and reduce the risk of spreading the virus and contracting the disease during the COVID-19 era, we operated a group of our patients under spinal anesthesia rather than general anesthesia. Method(s): We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent discectomy surgery for lumbar spinal disc herniation under SA between September 2020 and 2021. Result(s): Sixty-four patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation underwent lumbar discectomy with SA. All patients except three were male. The mean age was 44.52 +/- 7.95 years (28 to 64 years). The mean procedure time for SA was 10 minutes. The duration of the surgery was 40 to 90 minutes per each level of disc herniation. The mean blood loss was 350 cc (200 to 600 cc). The most common involved level was L4/L5 intervertebral disc (n = 40 patients;63.5%). The mean recovery time was 20 minutes. Only three patients requested more analgesics for relief of their pain postoperatively. All patients with discectomy were discharged a day after surgery, and in the case of fusion, two days after surgery. All the patients were followed up for six months, showing no recurrence symptoms, good pain relief, satisfaction with the surgery, and no bad memory of the surgery. Conclusion(s): Spinal anesthesia is a good alternative or even the main anesthesia route for patients with lumbar disc herniation. More studies are needed to elucidate the best candidate for SA in patients with lumbar pathology.Copyright © 2023, Author(s).

Bedside vs webside: Assessing patient-reported experiences for in-person and telemedicine-based perioperative evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Though telemedicine has been identified as safe and feasible, data on patient reported experiences (PREs) are lacking. We sought to compare PREs between in-person and telemedicine-based perioperative care. METHODS: Patients evaluated from August-November 2021 were prospectively surveyed to assess experiences and satisfaction with care rendered during in-person and telemedicine-based encounters. Patient and hernia characteristics, encounter related plans, and PREs were compared between in-person and telemedicine-based care. RESULTS: Of 109 respondents (86% response rate), 55% (n = 60) utilized telemedicine-based perioperative care. Indirect costs were lower for patients using telemedicine-based services, including work absence (3% vs. 33%, P < 0.001), lost wages (0% vs. 14%, P = 0.003), and requirements for hotel accommodations (0% vs. 12%, P = 0.007). PREs related to telemedicine-based care were non-inferior to in-person care across all measured domains (P > 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine-based care yields significant cost-savings over in-person care with similar patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that systems should focus on optimization of perioperative telemedicine services.

The use of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block anesthesia in inguinal bladder hernia repair

Aim: There are data showing that the use of minimally invasive anesthesia methods (local anesthesia, nerve blocks) as an alternative to traditional anesthesia methods used in inguinal hernia repair surgery is safe and effective. During the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected the whole world, we aimed to evaluate the use of minimally invasive anesthesia methods in patients with inguinal bladder hernia, as well as their perioperative and postoperative results in our pilot study.Material and Methods: We evaluated the perioperative and postoperative data of five patients with inguinal bladder hernia, who underwent surgery with local anesthesia and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blockade, four of which were performed during the COVID-19 pandemic.Results: It is possible to perform inguinal bladder hernia surgery with local anesthesia and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block, including in secondary cases. Better hemodynamic stabilization in the intraoperative period reduces the need for narcotic analgesics by providing effective analgesia in the postoperative period, as well as reducing the risk of contamination in airway control.Discussions: Performing inguinal bladder hernia surgery using local anesthesia and ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block provides reliable and effective analgesia during the perioperative and postoperative periods.

A nontraumatic, right-sided diaphragmatic hernia in an adult diagnosed during an asthma attack

Case report We present a rare case of a right-sided diaphragmatic herniation of the ascending colon, in a 76-year-old asthmatic patient with a non-congenital diaphragmatic hernia, no history of trauma, surgery, or radiation. The patient presented at the emergency room with dyspnea, non-productive cough, wheezing, tachypnea, tight chest, respiratory failure. This patient has a 40-year history of severe persistent extrinsic asthma, treated with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and LABA. Before the pandemic, this patient was hospitalized 3-4 times a year for her asthma attacks, but in the last 2 years, due to Covid-19, the patient was not hospitalized, resulting in uncontrolled asthma with daily symptoms. During the hospitalization, chest radiography was performed where the hernia was suspected and confirmed by a CT Scan. Despite the diagnosis of diaphragmatic herniation, she was clinically better with the proper asthma treatment and after consulting with her family she refused the intervention to correct the hernia. She has had two vaginal deliveries, no malignancies, no trauma, no intervention in her life. In this case, the only possible cause for the herniation of the colon is persistent cough combined with advanced age, chronic steroid use, and obstructive lung disease. Non-traumatic, right-sided diaphragmatic hernia of the colon in adults is very rare. Persistent cough with other predisposing conditions of this patient is the cause of this herniation. The chest X-ray and CT were essential for making the diagnosis. Rare hernias like this should be kept in mind when coming to a diagnosis.

Investigation of general surgery consultations in COVID-19 patients treated in a tertiary hospital

Objectives: The aim of the study is to reveal the most common general surgery problems during the pandemic period in our center, where all departments only deal with COVID-19 patients. Methods: In our study, general surgery consultations made between 1st November 2020 and 1st February 2021, when our center only served pandemic patients, were retrospectively examined. Demographic data of the patients, distribution of the departments where consultation was requested, reasons for consultation, pathology detection rate, treatment modalities, mortality rates and surgical procedures were included. Results: A total of 70 patients, 33 female, and 37 male, were included in this study. The most common problems of the patients were gastrointestinal system (GIS) problems (46/70, 65.7%). The second most common problem was hepatopancreaticobiliary problems (12/70, 17.1%). This was followed by soft tissue disorders, hernia problems, and trauma cases, respectively. These were mostly treated medically, but surgical treatment was sometimes required (77.1% vs 22.9%). Conclusions: As reported in the literature, the most common surgical pathologies in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are usually related to the GIS. These pathologies can mostly be treated medically (73.9%). However, surgical treatment was more rarely required (26.1%). The highest rate of surgical treatment was for hernia patients (100%). In general, medical treatment was successful. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of European Research Journal is the property of Prusa Medical Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Hernia Surgical Treatment, Multi-options and Paucity of Statistical Conformation for the Preferred Surgical Option

Background: Hernia is a common pathology around the globe and is reported more frequently particularly inguinal hernia. Aims: To identify the surgery of choice for the treatment of hernias by evaluating the required postoperative hospitalization time, as no other complications have been reported according to data from Mordovian Republic hospital. Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study involved 790 patients for the period 2017-2022 treated surgically for various types of hernia;inguinal hernia, umbilical hernia, spontaneously reduced strangulated post-operative ventral hernia, incarcerated post-operative ventral hernia, and hernia of the Lina Alba. The T-test was used for statistical analysis, and a one-way ANOVA test and Pearson correlation test were conducted using the Statistica program. Results: The hospitalization period after Liechtenstein surgery is statistically less than Postemsky surgery (mean 6.88 days, 7.43 days, respectively, t value -2.29593, p<0.02) and laparoscopic surgery (mean 6.88 days, 8.19072 days, respectively, t value 4,206817, p<0,000031). At the same time, laparoscopic surgery has a shorter post-operative hospitalization than Postemsky surgery (t value -2.19326, p<0.02). According to the surgical approach, the patient's post-operative hospitalization days differ (mean days: min. days;max. days, 7.50192: 0.00;30.00). According to Postemsky (M ± m;7.43262, ±0.167012), according to Martynov (M ± m;8.37500, ±0.113440), according to Liechtenstein (M ± m;6.88153, ±0.146845), according to Mayo (M ± m;7.51282, ±0.280156), according to Bassini (M ± m;8.77778, ± 2.379179), laparoscopically (M ± m;8.19072, ± 0.268434), according to Sapezhko (M ± m;8.25000, ± 1.380074), and another type of surgery (M ± m;11.40000, ± 2.501999). Women (mean 8.525114 days) were hospitalized longer than men (mean 7.065371 days), t value 5.871044, p< 0.001. A statistically significant correlation has been found between age and postoperative hospitalization time (Pearson Rank Order Correlations r=0.215561, p <0.05). Conclusion: The study shows that the Lichtenstein surgery is the surgery of choice in terms of hospitalization time after the surgery. Straight association between sex and age with postoperative hospitalization days.